Skip to main content

Suzy vs Taeyeon, whose life would you want to live?


Suzy
Debuted at the age of 16. Became a trend with visuals and then a top idol by a movie appearance. Dominated the nation, filmed various CFs, and earned a ton. Starred in dramas with amazing male actors. Want to succeed in singing as well but her group's popularity is too lacking compared to her individual popularity.



Taeyeon
Debuted at the age of 19. Became the ultimate stan attractor with singing talent and cute/pretty looks. Got a lot of hate with dating news, but her solo albums hit daebak and is known as the best female idol singer. Biggest fandom, amazing gifts from fans. Her group is the national girl group. Her group, subunits, and solo are all daebak.

-

Pann: Suzy vs Taeyeon, whose life would you want to live?

1. [+103, -54] Taeyeon's life looks happier to me. Suzy must've earned a lot but she's not very recognized for her music promotions, which is something that she truly desired for. I think she'll always feel regretful about it. Like Taeyeon, doing what you love and getting recognized will make you really happy.

2. [+97, -32] Taeyeon. Becoming a top with one's job is really cool.

3. [+91, -13] Suzy is a top celebrity but Taeyeon is a top singer.

4. [+46, -4] For the visuals, I really want to be Suzy...

5. [+44, -10] Suzy's solo is coming up. She'll have chances to get recognized.

6. [+44, -11] MLBPARK had a similar survey and more than 90% people chose Suzy even though the site is full of SM stans.

7. [+41, -5] I think Suzy is definitely a better choice... Her group is the flaw but they're disbanding anyways.

8. [+39, -10] Taeyeon for me. Popularity aside, Suzy's strength is her visual. It's not a lie to say she's earning money by her face. It has limits. On the other hand, Taeyeon's strength is her singing talent and it has no limits. Besides, her talent is one of the best...

Comments

  1. Just got my check for $500.

    Many times people don't believe me when I tell them about how much money you can earn filling out paid surveys online...

    So I took a video of myself getting paid $500 for filling paid surveys.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mamamoo Hwasa's sexual performance?

Pann : Mamamoo Hwasa, isn't this too much? 1. [+140, -5] It looks more sexual because she has a good body. It was Mamamoo's concert and it was +15. 2. [+95, -15] This is why they say women's enemy is women. You call it sexy when male idols rip their clothes off and do pelvic dances but it's a problem when a female idol does it? It only looks sexy and pretty. 3. [+85, -1] It would be considered too much if this was done on broadcast but it was a +15 concert. It's fine. 4. [+35, -0] It's still better than female idols' lolita appeal nowadays 5. [+26, -0] It looks more like that because the dress color is nude. And like in foreign countries, adult sexiness is better than short school uniforms and lolita. 6. [+23, -0] You never bought an album and yet you're complaining about this and that 7. [+22, -1] It's a concert anyways. Other male idols wear more sexual clothes. 8. [+21, -26] It looks a bit off...

Park Hyo Shin oppa

Pann : Park Hyo Shin honestly 1. [+113, -15] Park Hyo Shin sings really well with a handsome face. It's so unfair. He's also tall with a good body ㅋㅋㅋㅋ It'll be fair if he looks like Kim Bun Soo. 2. [+107, -210] Didn't he get a lot of plastic surgery? 3. [+80, -14] I was wondering who the person is in the first picture ㅋㅋㅋㅋ I didn't know Park Hyo Shin was this handsome ㅋㅋ 4. [+33, -2] You'll end up searching for all Youtube videos if you fall for Park Hyo Shin... I've been a fan for 8 years <3 5. [+31, -6] I knew people would mention plastic surgery... This gif is from 11 years ago... All he did was getting his eyes done once 10 years ago. Teeth are not considered plastic surgery. 6. [+28, -2] ㅋㅋ You won't notice any idols if you fall for Park Hyo Shin. 7. [+14, -0] Don't look up Park Hyo Shin on Youtube... Your bank account and mentality will be robbed....

WJSN Cheng Xiao Shows Off Her Flexibility!